[Cocci] Re: problems with typecasts
c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006 at gmx.net
Thu Mar 5 20:30:29 CET 2009
On 05.03.2009 19:02, Julia Lawall wrote:
>> The semantic patch above generates the following warnings:
>> warning: line 19: should readb be a metavariable?
>> warning: line 21: should writeb be a metavariable?
> It assumes that anything for which you propose alternatives should be
> a metavariable. But for a function name, this is probably not the case.
> In any case, it follows what you specified, so there is no harm done.
Thanks for the explanation.
>> warning: rule starting on line 13: metavariable a not used in the - or
>> context code
> If you look again, you will see that the last rule declares a but does not
> use it.
Yes, I noticed that a minute before I saw your mail when I reread the
If you want to link to the finalized semantic patch and the unified
diff, feel free to do so.
Last post before committing:
The actual commit is posted here:
Thanks again for your help
More information about the Cocci